Designing a Framework for Empowering Public Employees in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Transition from Technical Competencies to Cognitive-Ethical Competencies

Authors

  • Seyed Mahdi Tayebi Researcher

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63053/ijmea.90

Keywords:

Empowering Public Employees, Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Introduction: The advent of artificial intelligence in the field of public administration has created the necessity for a fundamental redefinition of employee empowerment. The present study aimed to design a comprehensive framework for empowering public employees in the age of artificial intelligence, with emphasis on the transition from purely technical competencies to cognitive-ethical competencies.

Methodology: This study is applied-developmental in terms of purpose and mixed (sequential exploratory) in terms of method. In the qualitative phase, using the grounded theory method (Strauss and Corbin approach) and conducting 22 semi-structured interviews with experts in public administration, artificial intelligence, and organizational behavior, data were collected and analyzed in three stages of open, axial, and selective coding. In the quantitative phase, a researcher-made questionnaire based on the extracted components was designed and administered to a sample of 384 managers and senior experts of Iranian public organizations. Quantitative data were analyzed using structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis in AMOS software.

Findings: Analysis of qualitative data led to the identification of 112 open codes, 24 concepts, and 12 main categories. The main categories were categorized into 6 paradigm components: (1) cognitive competencies (critical thinking, creative problem solving, data literacy, self-regulated learning), (2) ethical competencies (ethical judgment, algorithmic accountability, data privacy, transparency-seeking), (3) metacognitive competencies (awareness of biases, oversight of intelligent decisions, critical intervention ability, and hostility), (4) human-human competencies (including cooperation, management of cognitive conflict, and algorithmic modeling), (5) design effectiveness (including new evaluation system, continuous learning infrastructure, and organizational excellence), and (6) psychological-occupational health, hybrid decisions, and continuous learning. Quantitative results showed that the extracted model has a desirable fit (GFI=0.92, CFI=0.94, RMSEA=0.045) and all paths were confirmed at the significance level of 0.001.

Conclusion: Empowering public employees in the age of artificial intelligence requires a paradigm shift from traditional approaches based on technical skills training to a comprehensive and multidimensional approach based on cultivating cognitive, ethical, and metacognitive competencies. The framework presented in this study...

References

Persian References

• Akbari, A., Rahmani, M., & Karimi, S. (1402). Designing a model for empowering bank employees in the age of digital transformation. Public Administration, 15(4), 81-106.

• Hassanzadeh, M., Alavi, S., & Karimi, R. (1403). Presenting a model of good governance in smart cities with a grounded theory approach. Public Administration, 16(1), 89-118.

• Heidari, A., & Nikbakht, M. (1402). Designing a human resource planning model in Iranian public organizations. Biannual Journal of Public Administration, 14(1), 89-118.

• Pour Ahmadi, A., Ziyari, K., & Hatami Nezhad, H. (1403). Assessing the level of smart city realization in metropolises of Iran. Geographical Research on Urban Planning, 12(1), 45-72.

• Rezaei, F., Mousavi, S., & Kazemi, A. (1402). Designing a model of good governance in the municipalities of metropolises of Iran. Journal of Organizational Resource Management Research, 13(2), 23-50.

English References

• Author, D. (2024). The labor market impact of artificial intelligence: A review of recent evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 62(2), 523-573.

• Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482.

• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

• Cropley, D. H., Medin, D. L., & Kaufman, J. C. (2023). The dark side of creativity and innovation: A meta-analytic review. Creativity Research Journal, 35(2), 145-168.

• Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., et al. (2023). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994.

• Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., et al. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689-707.

• Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627-660.

• Hilbert, M. (2011). Digital empowerment: The role of ICTs in development. Information Technologies & International Development, 7(4), 1-5.

• Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books.

• Kitchin, R. (2025). The data revolution and smart cities: A critical perspective. In Handbook of Urban Geography. Edward Elgar Publishing.

• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

• Mazzone, M., & Elgammal, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: A review of the literature. Journal of Business Research, 105, 349-360.

• OECD. (2025). Artificial intelligence in the public sector: A review of current practices. OECD Publishing.

• Patel, S. (2025). Governance & guardrails: Emerging technologies and low-wage workers. Maryland Law Review, 85(1), 1-46.

• Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation-augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192-210.

• Rocha, A. (2026). California's AI employment laws look tough, but they leave workers exposed. CalMatters Commentary.

• Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.

• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Published

2026-09-24

How to Cite

Tayebi, S. M. (2026). Designing a Framework for Empowering Public Employees in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Transition from Technical Competencies to Cognitive-Ethical Competencies. International Journal of Applied Research in Management, Economics and Accounting, 3(2), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.63053/ijmea.90

Issue

Section

Articles