The impact of participatory budgeting on public trust and government efficiency

Authors

  • Mojtaba Almasi - Master of Public Administration, Department of Management, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), Isfahan, Iran.
  • Jafar Amiri Ebrahim Mohammadi PhD student in Accounting, Department of Accounting, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), Isfahan, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63053/ijmea.16

Keywords:

participatory budgeting, trust, government efficiency, meta-analysis, public administration, government policies, statistical analysis, government-people relations

Abstract

This article examines the impact of investment budgeting on public and government productivity. The main goal of this research is to examine the positive and negative aspects of participatory budgeting on the level of public trust and government efficiency. To achieve this goal, the meta-analysis method has been used. In this research, 30 valid studies that were conducted between 2010 and 2023 have been examined. The data of these studies have been analysed using SPSS and Meta-Analysis Manager statistical software. The results show that budgeting significantly increases public trust and improves government efficiency. Also, data analysis shows that the effectiveness of this method is different in different cases, according to culture and political policy. The findings indicate that participatory budgeting can be used as an efficient tool to improve the efficiency of governments and increase public trust. The general conclusion of this research shows that the acceptance and implementation of participatory budgeting in government policies can lead to the improvement of relations between the government and the people and the promotion of productivity.

References

• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224.

• Baiocchi, G. (2005). Militants and Citizens: The Politics of Participatory Democracy in Porto Alegre. Stanford University Press.

• Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. (2017). Popular Democracy: The Paradox of Participation. Stanford University Press.

• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Wiley.

• Cabannes, Y. (2004). Participatory budgeting: A significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environment and Urbanization, 16(1), 27-46.

• De Vries, M., Nemec, J., & Varela, A. (2021). Participatory Budgeting: Theory and Practice. Public Administration Review.

• Ebdon, C., & Franklin, A. (2006). Citizen Participation in Budgeting Theory. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 437-447.

• Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press.

• Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66, 66-75.

• Gilman, H., & Wampler, B. (2019). Participatory Budgeting and Civic Engagement. American Political Science Review.

• Gomez, L., O’Hagan, A., & Goncalves, S. (2016). Participatory Budgeting in Europe: Enhancing Public Trust. European Journal of Political Research.

• Gonçalves, S. (2014). The effects of participatory budgeting on municipal expenditures and infant mortality in Brazil. World Development, 53, 94-110.

• Lehtonen, T. (2022). Participatory Budgeting as a Democratic Innovation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.

• Marquetti, A. (2012). Participatory economic democracy in Porto Alegre, Brazil. In Political and Civic Engagement: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Routledge.

• Milosavljević, M., Spasenić, Ž., & Krivokapić, J. (2023). Bibliometric Review of Participatory Budgeting: Current Status and Future Research Agenda. International Journal of Financial Studies.

• Moir, E., & Leyshon, M. (2013). Designing Participatory Budgeting Processes for Public Trust. Governance.

• Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press.

• Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.

• Shah, A. (2007). Participatory Budgeting. World Bank Publications.

• Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., & Röcke, A. (2008). Participatory Budgeting in Europe: Potentials and Challenges. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 164-178.

• Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., & Röcke, A. (2013). Participatory budgeting in Europe: Potentials and challenges. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(1), 164-178.

• Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., & Röcke, A. (2016). Participatory Budgeting in Europe: Democracy and Public Governance. Routledge.

• Wampler, B. (2010). Participatory Budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, Cooperation, and Accountability. Penn State Press.

• Wampler, B. (2012). Participatory Budgeting: Core Principles and Key Impacts. Journal of Public Deliberation, 8(2), Article 12.

• Wampler, B. (2012). Participatory budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, cooperation, and accountability. Pennsylvania State University Press.

• Wampler, B., & Goldfrank, B. (2022). The Evolution of Participatory Budgeting in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society.

• Wampler, B., & Touchton, M. (2014). Brazil let participatory budgeting thrive. Now it's time to take it national. World Development, 53, 102-114.

• Zamboni, Y. (2007). Participatory Budgeting and Local Governance: An Evidence-Based Evaluation of Participatory Budgeting Experiences in Brazil. World Bank.

• ChatGPT 4o Version

Published

2024-06-29

How to Cite

Almasi , M., & Amiri Ebrahim Mohammadi, J. (2024). The impact of participatory budgeting on public trust and government efficiency. International Journal of Applied Research in Management, Economics and Accounting, 1(2), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.63053/ijmea.16

Issue

Section

Articles