The Effect of Social Intelligence and Knowledge Management on The Teaching Organization According to The Moderating Role of Trust and Gender

Hamid Rezaie far; Mahbobeh Montazer Ataei

doi:10.63053/ijmea.2

Authors

Hamid Rezaie far Assistant professor of Department of Public Management, Birjand branch, Islamic Azad University, Birjand,Iran
Mahbobeh Montazer Ataei Assistant Prof. of Educational Management, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63053/ijmea.2

Keywords:

Social intelligence, Teaching organization, Knowledge management, Trust

Abstract

This study is aimed at investigating the effect of Trust in the relationship between knowledge management and teaching organization, the effect of Gender in the relationship between Social intelligence and teaching organization, also the effect of Trust and Gender among them. The sample size was calculated by conducting Cochran's formula, and research data were collected by distributing questionnaires between 126 employees of the branch of Saderat Bank in Mashhad. The hypothesized model was tested by conducting structural equation modeling in AMOS software. Research results indicated that Social intelligence and knowledge management are positively related to teaching organization and It also indicated that trust is a moderator of the relationship between knowledge management and teaching organization, Gender is a moderator of the relationship between the Social intelligence and teaching organization, also Trust and Gender are moderators of the relationship between them.

References

Crowne, K. A. (2009). The relationships among social intelligence, emotional intelligence and cultural intelligence, Organization Management Journal, 6, 148–163.

Dietz Graham and Hartog Deanne N. Den.(2006).Measuring trust inside organizations, Personnel Review, 35(5), 557-588.

Dogan. T.M. Citin ,B. (2009). The validity ،reliabity and factorial structure of the Turkish version of the tromso social intelligence scale. Educational sciences: Theory & Practice,9(2) ,709-720.

Dysvik, Anders ;Buch, Robert and Kuvaas, Bård.(2015).Knowledge donating and knowledge collecting, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36 (1), 35 – 53

Gbadamosi, Gbolahan, and Josephine Ndaba.(2007). Predicting charlatan behaviour in a non -western setting:lack of trust or absence of commitment ? Journal of Management Development 26(8), 753-769.

Han B and Anantatmula.(2007). Knowledge Sharing in Large IT Organizations: A Case Study. The VINE: Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 37(4), 421-439.

Huang, C.F. and Hsueh S.L. (2007),A Study on the Relationship Between Intellectual Capital and Business Performance in the Engineering Consulting Industry: A Path Analysis, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 8(4), 265-271.

Huysman, M.(2006). IT to Support Knowledge Sharing in Communities: Towards a Social Capital Analysis, Jornal of Information Technology, 21(3), 40-51.

Lee Hyun-Jung.(2004). The role of competence-based trust and organizational identification in continuous improvement, Journal of Management Psychology, 19(6), 623-639.

Nijholt, A., Stock, O. & Nishida, T. (2009). Social intelligence design in ambient intelligence. AI & Soc, 24,1-3.

Patti, J., Senge, P., & Madrazo, C. (2015). Growing School Leaders Who Can Grow Learning Cultures. In J. A. Durlak, C. E. Domitrovich, R. P. Weissberg & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.)

Robbins Stephen P. (2003), Organizational Behavior, 9th ed, Prentice Hall.

Sánchez-Núñez, María Trinidad;Patti, Janet; and Holzer, Allison.(2015). Effectiveness of a Leadership Development Program that Incorporates Social and Emotional Intelligence for Aspiring School Leaders. Journal of Educational Issues, 1(1),65-84

Smith Gene (2005), How to achieve organizational trust within an accounting department, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 20, Number 5, 2005, pp. 520-523(4)

Tichy, N. & Cohen, E. (1998). The teaching organization, Training and Development,52(7),26-33

Turnbull, B., Riley, D., & MacFarlane, J. (2013). Cultivating talent through a principal pipeline (Vol. 2). Policy studies associates, Inc. Wallace Foundation.

Wilyams, p.(2002). The paradox of power, New York: warner Books.within an accounting department, Managerial Auditing Journal.